Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1100120220290040265
´ëÇÑ°ñ´ë»çÇÐȸÁö
2022 Volume.29 No. 4 p.265 ~ p.269
Homogenic Evaluation for Spatial Distribution in Osteoclast Differentiation
Lim Hyun-Sook

Shin Hong-In
Jeong Dae-Won
Abstract
Background: Cells have heterogeneous cellular diversity in size, morphology, cell cycle, metabolism, differentiation degree, and spatial distribution. The shift of specific cells to- wards the desired cells is crucial for maintaining uniform cellular function and can be represented by homogeneity and heterogeneity. Here, we developed a simple and di- rect method for evaluating the homogeneous distribution of desired cells in a constant region.

Methods: We differentiated osteoclast progenitors into bone-resorbing multinu- cleated giant osteoclasts in a 2-dimensional culture plate under 2 conditions. Cells were stained with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase to assess osteoclast differentiation, im- ages were taken using a microscope and divided into sectors, and the number of osteo- clasts (¡Ã3 nuclei) in each sector was counted. To assess the homogeneity of the spatial distribution of osteoclasts, the standard deviation (SD) was calculated from the mean number of osteoclasts within each sector.

Results: From the 2 groups, a value with a SD close to 0 indicates high spatial homogeneity while a relatively high SD represents low spatial homogeneity.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that spatial homogeneity can be represented as SD.
KEYWORD
Cell differentiation, Homogeneity, Heterogeneity, Osteoclast, Spatial distri-bution
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed